feR7cEJkk3
.pdf597.562(265.53) 28.693.324-6
. .
«
»
. ,
2012–2013
|
|
. |
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
, |
2012–2013 . |
|
|
|
|
, |
|
|
|
|
|
. |
|
|
|
|
|
: |
|
( |
), |
, |
, |
. |
|
|
|
V.V. Ulyanicheva
Murmansk Arctic State University
Murmansk, Russia
EVALUATION OF BLUE WHITING AND CAPELIN FECUNDITY
IN YEARS 2012–2013
Abstract. This paper presents the results of investigation of individual absolute fecundity (IAF) of blue whiting and Barents Sea capelin caught in years 2012–2013. Blue whiting and capelin IAF is designated, dependence of blue whiting and capelin IAF on age and size is analyzed.
Key words: individual absolute fecundity (IAF), blue whiting, capelin, Barents
Sea.
(Micromesistius poutassou) |
(Mallotus vil- |
losus) |
[8, 11]. |
[5].
,. .
,
[2, 5, 6]. |
, |
, |
[2, |
3, 6].
71
( |
) |
– |
2012–2013 . |
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
. |
. . |
( |
« |
|
»), |
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
- |
|||
|
( |
|
). |
|
, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
– |
2012–2013 . |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
2012–2013 |
. |
|
|
|
|
, |
|
|
. |
4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
, |
|
|
2–3 |
. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0,001 . |
|
|
, |
|
|
[7, |
10, |
12]. |
|
|
|
|
|
, |
, 50 |
100 |
|
|
|
|
. |
30 |
8×2 |
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
, |
|
|
|
, |
|
|
, |
. |
|
|
. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
30 |
( |
|
|
, |
|
|
0,5 |
). |
, |
|
|
|
[3, |
10, 12]. |
, |
|
|
. |
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
, . . |
, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
[4, 10, 12]. |
|
|
|
[10]: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
): r |
; |
|
|
|
|
|
( |
): r = |
, |
|
r – |
|
|
|
|
( |
); |
|
m1 – |
|
; |
|
|
|
|
|
m2 – |
|
; |
|
|
|
|
|
m3 – |
|
; |
|
|
|
|
|
n – |
|
|
|
. |
129 |
|
. |
|
|
|
, |
|
|
||
|
|
, |
|
|
|
, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
. |
|
|
|
, |
|
|
|
2012–2013 |
. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
25 |
. |
742 |
. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012 . |
|
276 |
. |
|
, |
2013 . – 131 |
. |
2012 . |
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
3 |
, |
2013 |
. – 2 |
, |
|
– |
|
|
10 |
. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012 . |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
, |
2013 |
. – 23 |
, |
|
– |
2012 |
. – |
|
|
40 |
, |
|
2013 |
. – 41 . |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
, |
|
|
|
|
|
32–38 |
|
|
|
, |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1, 3, |
10, |
12]. |
|
|
|
, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
, |
|
. |
|
, |
|
|
, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
. |
2013 . |
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
. |
|
. |
|
, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
. |
586 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012–2013 . |
|
|
5 |
. |
20 |
|
. |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
2012 |
. 11 229 |
, |
2013 |
. – 10 877 |
|
. |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012 |
2013 . |
|
|
|
|
||
|
2 |
, |
|
|
– |
|
5 |
. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
– |
|
|
19 . |
2012–2013 . |
|
|
|
13 |
, |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
. |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012 . |
|
|
|
|
0,58 |
|
0,98 |
|
|
|
0,80 |
. |
2013 . |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
0,57–0,98 |
, |
, |
|
|
0,77 |
. |
|
||
|
|
, |
|
|
|
|
|
. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
: |
|
|
|
, |
|
|
2012–2013 . |
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012 . |
|
|
101 |
. – 742 |
. |
|
( |
|||
|
276 |
. |
|
), |
|
2013 |
. – 24 |
. – |
640 |
. |
|
( |
||
|
130 |
. |
|
). |
|
|
|
2012 . |
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
3 |
, |
|
|
– |
|
|
10 |
, |
2013 . |
|
|
– |
|
|
2 |
, |
|
|
– |
|
|
10 |
. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012 . |
|
|
|
||
|
27 |
, |
|
|
– 40 |
, |
2013 . |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
, |
|
|
– 41 . |
|
|
|
, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32–38 |
|
|
|
|
|
, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
. |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
2012 . |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
. |
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
2012 . |
|
|
|
6 |
. – |
19 |
. ( |
|
|
|
11 229 |
|
), |
|
2013 |
. – 5 |
. – |
19 |
. |
|
( |
|
|
||
10 877 |
). |
|
|
|
|
2012 |
2013 . |
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
2 |
, |
|
|
– |
|
|
5 |
. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012 . |
|
|
|
|
13 |
, |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
18 |
, |
2013 . |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,5 |
, |
|
– |
|
|
18,5 . |
|
|
|
||
[9, 11]. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012 . |
|
|
0,58–0,98 |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
( |
|
0,80 |
|
), |
2013 |
|
. |
|
|
|
|
|
0,57 |
|
0,98 |
( |
|
|
0,77 |
). |
|
(0,58 |
) |
2012 . |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
3, |
|
|
|
(0,98 |
) – |
|
|
4, |
2013 . |
|
|
|
|
(0,57 |
) |
|
|
|
(0,98 |
|
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
|
. . |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
. |
– |
.: |
, |
1969. – 291 . |
|
. ., |
|
|
. ., |
|
|
. . |
|
|
|
|||
2. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
, 2003. – 187 . |
|
|
|
|
|
|
. |
– |
.: |
- |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
3. |
|
. . |
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
. – |
|
: |
- |
|
, 2011. – 188 . |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74
4. |
|
. . |
|
|
|
|
|
// |
- |
|
. – |
1949. |
– |
|
. 28. – |
. 103–114. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
5. |
|
. . |
|
|
|
|
|
. – |
.: |
, 2013. – 416 . |
|
|||
6. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
, |
ё |
, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/ |
|
; |
. . . |
|
, |
. . |
, . . |
|
[ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
.]; |
. |
|
. . . |
. – |
|
: |
- |
|
, 2004. – 300 . |
|
||||
7. |
|
|
. . |
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
// |
. |
|
. – 1978. – |
. 41. – |
. 89–96. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
8. |
|
. |
., |
|
. . |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// |
|
. |
- |
. – 2011. – |
|
. |
|
. – |
. 46–48. |
|
|
|
|
9. |
|
. |
., |
|
. ., |
|
|
. . |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
. – |
|
: |
- |
|
, 2004. – 198 . |
|
|
||
10. |
. – |
. . |
: |
|
. - |
, 1987. – 109 . |
|
: |
|
|
||||
|
|
- |
|
|
|
/ |
||||||||
11. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
; |
|
. . . |
, . . |
|
, . . |
|
, . |
. |
[ |
.]; |
. |
||
. . . |
|
|
. – |
|
: |
|
- |
|
, 1991. – 193 . |
|
|
|
||
12. |
|
|
. |
., |
|
. . |
|
|
|
// |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
. – |
|
, 1976. – |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. |
|
|
|
|
|
– |
. 54–62. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75
316.4(08) 60.52. 43
. .
«
»
. ,
|
. |
– |
. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
, |
|
. |
|
. |
|
. |
, |
, |
|
, |
|
|
|
. |
|
|
|
: |
, |
, |
, |
, |
|
. |
A.V. Menshikova
Murmansk Arctic State University
Murmansk, Russia
ETHOLOGICAL OBSERVATIONS OF THE GREY SEAL
OF THE BALTIC SUBSPECIES
Abstract. The behavior of the animal is available for observation is the result of action of biological systems. The article is devoted to ethological studies of the grey seal of the Baltic subspecies in captivity. Methods of studying animal behaviour. It is noted that earlier ethological observations were carried out on grey seals of the Atlantic subspecies. Due to the fact that the morphology and lifestyle of the existing subspecies are quite different from each other, it was decided to create a single part catalog motor behaviour of the grey seal of the Baltic subspecies.
Key words: ethological observations, grey seal, Baltic subspecies, artificial conditions of the Murmansk Oceanarium.
,
ё |
, |
, |
, |
. |
, |
, |
,
76
|
|
|
|
. |
|
, |
|
( |
), |
|
|
, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[2]. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
, |
|
|
|
|
( |
|
). |
|
, |
|
, |
( |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
). |
|
|
« |
|
|
|
», |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[3]. |
|
|
|
. |
. |
ё |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
, |
|
|
. .) |
[1]. |
|
, |
|
|
|
, |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
. |
|
|
|
( |
) |
|
3×5 |
4 |
. |
ё |
|
|
|
, |
, |
|
. |
|
. |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
|
) |
|
|
|
|
( |
): |
; |
; |
; |
|
|
; |
. |
|
|
|
|
( |
). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
. . |
. . |
. |
|
, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( – |
, – |
, |
– |
, |
– |
|
, – |
), |
|
|
|
– |
|
( 1 – |
|
|
, |
2 – |
|
|
), |
|
|
( |
1.1 – |
|
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
– |
|
. |
|
|
|
). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
. |
|
1 |
|
|
|
– |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
: |
( |
|
|
|
|
|
) |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ё |
( |
, |
). |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
) |
|
|
, |
( |
ё |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
1.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
, |
, |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
. |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
, |
, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
. |
|
( |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ё |
( |
, |
). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
, |
|
( |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
( |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
( |
|
|
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78
,
2.2
.
|
|
|
|
( |
|
) |
|
( |
|
|
|
|
). |
|
, |
|
|
|
|
. |
|
|
|
. |
|
« |
ё » |
|
|
|
|
|
, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ё |
|
, |
|
|
. |
|
|
|
ё |
, |
||
|
|
|
. |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
. |
|
|
|
1. |
. ., |
|
. . |
|
|
|
|
: |
|
– .: |
- |
« |
», 2003. – 368 . |
2. |
. . |
|
|
|
|
|
|
: . |
. – |
: |
, 2003. – 365 . |
||
3. |
. ., |
: |
. . |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
. – |
.: |
, 1990. – 17 . |
|
|
|
|
|
79
581.1/504.054
28.68
. . |
, |
. . |
«
»
. ,
И. .
Ц
. ,
FUCUS VESICULOSUS
.
Fucus vesiculosus,
.
: |
Fucus vesiculosus, |
, |
, |
, |
. |
M.V. Kolbeeva, E.A. Fisak
Murmansk State Technical University
Murmansk, Russia
I.V. Ryzhik
Murmansk marine biological institute Kola science centre RAS
Murmansk, Russia
ACTIVITY OF THE CATALASE
OF THE FUCUS VESICULOSUS OF THE BARENTS SEA
UNDER ANTROPOGENIC POLLUTION
Abstract. Activity of the catalase of the Fucus vesiculosus of the Barents sea under anthropogenic pollution. Its showed the activity of catalase in the apical cells Fucus vesiculosus, growing at several points of littoral of the Kola Bay.
Key words: Fucus vesiculosus, antioxidant system, catalase activity, Kola Bay, pollution.
.
[2].
2 |
, |
, |
|
. . |
– |
80 |
|