диафрагмированные волноводные фильтры / d9afa701-2396-4f62-805d-ff016eb3b926
.pdfConfidential manuscript submitted to replace this text with name of AGU journal
Table 2. Equivalent circuit elements’ values of the filter at 11 GHz
|
Parameter |
|
L2 (nH) |
Lm2 (nH) |
C2 (pF) |
Cm2 (pF) |
D2 (mm) |
Dm (mm) |
De (mm) |
|
Value |
|
0.518 |
0.001122 |
0.4036 |
0.0007 |
10.98 |
15.92 |
2.705 |
© 2016 American Geophysical Union. All rights reserved.
Confidential manuscript submitted to replace this text with name of AGU journal
Table 3. Influence of the parameters on the response of the UC dual-band bandstop filter
Parameter in (mm) |
f01 (GHz) |
B3dB1 (MHz) |
f02 (GHz) |
B3dB2 (GHz) |
c21 ↑ |
− |
− |
↓ |
↑ |
c11 ↓ |
↓ |
↓ |
↓ |
↑ |
R2 ↓ |
− |
↓ |
− |
↑ |
R1 ↓ |
↑ |
↑ |
↓ |
↑ |
d11 ↑ |
↓ |
↑ |
− |
↑ |
m ↑ |
↑ |
↑ |
− |
↓ |
© 2016 American Geophysical Union. All rights reserved.
Confidential manuscript submitted to replace this text with name of AGU journal
Figure 1. Quarter-wave resonator. a) 3D model. b) Equivalent electrical circuit.
© 2016 American Geophysical Union. All rights reserved.
Confidential manuscript submitted to replace this text with name of AGU journal
Figure 2. Comparison of frequency responses for the QWR: 3D model (Figure 1a) and equivalent electrical circuit (Figure 1b).
© 2016 American Geophysical Union. All rights reserved.
Confidential manuscript submitted to replace this text with name of AGU journal
Figure 3. E-plane waveguide bandstop filter using QWRs. a) 3D model. b) Equivalent electrical circuit. c) Comparison of frequency responses for 3D EM model and equivalent electrical circuit.
© 2016 American Geophysical Union. All rights reserved.
Confidential manuscript submitted to replace this text with name of AGU journal
Figure 4. 3D models of the nmICDS and mICDS E-plane dual-band bandstop waveguide filter.
© 2016 American Geophysical Union. All rights reserved.
Confidential manuscript submitted to replace this text with name of AGU journal
Figure 5. a) Equivalent electrical circuit of the nmICDS dual-band bandstop waveguide filter from Figure 4. b) Comparison of the frequency responses for the 3D EM model of the nmICDS dual-band bandstop filter and equivalent electrical circuit.
© 2016 American Geophysical Union. All rights reserved.
Confidential manuscript submitted to replace this text with name of AGU journal
Figure 6. 3D model of the E-plane ICDS triple-band bandstop waveguide filter.
© 2016 American Geophysical Union. All rights reserved.
Confidential manuscript submitted to replace this text with name of AGU journal
Figure 7. Comparison of frequency responses for the triple-band ICDS bandstop filter and single-band filters for each specified center frequency.
© 2016 American Geophysical Union. All rights reserved.
Confidential manuscript submitted to replace this text with name of AGU journal
Figure 8. a) 3D model of the UC dual-band bandstop waveguide filter. b) Comparison of simulated frequency responses for the UC and ICDS dual-band bandstop waveguide filters.
© 2016 American Geophysical Union. All rights reserved.