- •Preface
- •Imaging Microscopic Features
- •Measuring the Crystal Structure
- •References
- •Contents
- •1.4 Simulating the Effects of Elastic Scattering: Monte Carlo Calculations
- •What Are the Main Features of the Beam Electron Interaction Volume?
- •How Does the Interaction Volume Change with Composition?
- •How Does the Interaction Volume Change with Incident Beam Energy?
- •How Does the Interaction Volume Change with Specimen Tilt?
- •1.5 A Range Equation To Estimate the Size of the Interaction Volume
- •References
- •2: Backscattered Electrons
- •2.1 Origin
- •2.2.1 BSE Response to Specimen Composition (η vs. Atomic Number, Z)
- •SEM Image Contrast with BSE: “Atomic Number Contrast”
- •SEM Image Contrast: “BSE Topographic Contrast—Number Effects”
- •2.2.3 Angular Distribution of Backscattering
- •Beam Incident at an Acute Angle to the Specimen Surface (Specimen Tilt > 0°)
- •SEM Image Contrast: “BSE Topographic Contrast—Trajectory Effects”
- •2.2.4 Spatial Distribution of Backscattering
- •Depth Distribution of Backscattering
- •Radial Distribution of Backscattered Electrons
- •2.3 Summary
- •References
- •3: Secondary Electrons
- •3.1 Origin
- •3.2 Energy Distribution
- •3.3 Escape Depth of Secondary Electrons
- •3.8 Spatial Characteristics of Secondary Electrons
- •References
- •4: X-Rays
- •4.1 Overview
- •4.2 Characteristic X-Rays
- •4.2.1 Origin
- •4.2.2 Fluorescence Yield
- •4.2.3 X-Ray Families
- •4.2.4 X-Ray Nomenclature
- •4.2.6 Characteristic X-Ray Intensity
- •Isolated Atoms
- •X-Ray Production in Thin Foils
- •X-Ray Intensity Emitted from Thick, Solid Specimens
- •4.3 X-Ray Continuum (bremsstrahlung)
- •4.3.1 X-Ray Continuum Intensity
- •4.3.3 Range of X-ray Production
- •4.4 X-Ray Absorption
- •4.5 X-Ray Fluorescence
- •References
- •5.1 Electron Beam Parameters
- •5.2 Electron Optical Parameters
- •5.2.1 Beam Energy
- •Landing Energy
- •5.2.2 Beam Diameter
- •5.2.3 Beam Current
- •5.2.4 Beam Current Density
- •5.2.5 Beam Convergence Angle, α
- •5.2.6 Beam Solid Angle
- •5.2.7 Electron Optical Brightness, β
- •Brightness Equation
- •5.2.8 Focus
- •Astigmatism
- •5.3 SEM Imaging Modes
- •5.3.1 High Depth-of-Field Mode
- •5.3.2 High-Current Mode
- •5.3.3 Resolution Mode
- •5.3.4 Low-Voltage Mode
- •5.4 Electron Detectors
- •5.4.1 Important Properties of BSE and SE for Detector Design and Operation
- •Abundance
- •Angular Distribution
- •Kinetic Energy Response
- •5.4.2 Detector Characteristics
- •Angular Measures for Electron Detectors
- •Elevation (Take-Off) Angle, ψ, and Azimuthal Angle, ζ
- •Solid Angle, Ω
- •Energy Response
- •Bandwidth
- •5.4.3 Common Types of Electron Detectors
- •Backscattered Electrons
- •Passive Detectors
- •Scintillation Detectors
- •Semiconductor BSE Detectors
- •5.4.4 Secondary Electron Detectors
- •Everhart–Thornley Detector
- •Through-the-Lens (TTL) Electron Detectors
- •TTL SE Detector
- •TTL BSE Detector
- •Measuring the DQE: BSE Semiconductor Detector
- •References
- •6: Image Formation
- •6.1 Image Construction by Scanning Action
- •6.2 Magnification
- •6.3 Making Dimensional Measurements With the SEM: How Big Is That Feature?
- •Using a Calibrated Structure in ImageJ-Fiji
- •6.4 Image Defects
- •6.4.1 Projection Distortion (Foreshortening)
- •6.4.2 Image Defocusing (Blurring)
- •6.5 Making Measurements on Surfaces With Arbitrary Topography: Stereomicroscopy
- •6.5.1 Qualitative Stereomicroscopy
- •Fixed beam, Specimen Position Altered
- •Fixed Specimen, Beam Incidence Angle Changed
- •6.5.2 Quantitative Stereomicroscopy
- •Measuring a Simple Vertical Displacement
- •References
- •7: SEM Image Interpretation
- •7.1 Information in SEM Images
- •7.2.2 Calculating Atomic Number Contrast
- •Establishing a Robust Light-Optical Analogy
- •Getting It Wrong: Breaking the Light-Optical Analogy of the Everhart–Thornley (Positive Bias) Detector
- •Deconstructing the SEM/E–T Image of Topography
- •SUM Mode (A + B)
- •DIFFERENCE Mode (A−B)
- •References
- •References
- •9: Image Defects
- •9.1 Charging
- •9.1.1 What Is Specimen Charging?
- •9.1.3 Techniques to Control Charging Artifacts (High Vacuum Instruments)
- •Observing Uncoated Specimens
- •Coating an Insulating Specimen for Charge Dissipation
- •Choosing the Coating for Imaging Morphology
- •9.2 Radiation Damage
- •9.3 Contamination
- •References
- •10: High Resolution Imaging
- •10.2 Instrumentation Considerations
- •10.4.1 SE Range Effects Produce Bright Edges (Isolated Edges)
- •10.4.4 Too Much of a Good Thing: The Bright Edge Effect Hinders Locating the True Position of an Edge for Critical Dimension Metrology
- •10.5.1 Beam Energy Strategies
- •Low Beam Energy Strategy
- •High Beam Energy Strategy
- •Making More SE1: Apply a Thin High-δ Metal Coating
- •Making Fewer BSEs, SE2, and SE3 by Eliminating Bulk Scattering From the Substrate
- •10.6 Factors That Hinder Achieving High Resolution
- •10.6.2 Pathological Specimen Behavior
- •Contamination
- •Instabilities
- •References
- •11: Low Beam Energy SEM
- •11.3 Selecting the Beam Energy to Control the Spatial Sampling of Imaging Signals
- •11.3.1 Low Beam Energy for High Lateral Resolution SEM
- •11.3.2 Low Beam Energy for High Depth Resolution SEM
- •11.3.3 Extremely Low Beam Energy Imaging
- •References
- •12.1.1 Stable Electron Source Operation
- •12.1.2 Maintaining Beam Integrity
- •12.1.4 Minimizing Contamination
- •12.3.1 Control of Specimen Charging
- •12.5 VPSEM Image Resolution
- •References
- •13: ImageJ and Fiji
- •13.1 The ImageJ Universe
- •13.2 Fiji
- •13.3 Plugins
- •13.4 Where to Learn More
- •References
- •14: SEM Imaging Checklist
- •14.1.1 Conducting or Semiconducting Specimens
- •14.1.2 Insulating Specimens
- •14.2 Electron Signals Available
- •14.2.1 Beam Electron Range
- •14.2.2 Backscattered Electrons
- •14.2.3 Secondary Electrons
- •14.3 Selecting the Electron Detector
- •14.3.2 Backscattered Electron Detectors
- •14.3.3 “Through-the-Lens” Detectors
- •14.4 Selecting the Beam Energy for SEM Imaging
- •14.4.4 High Resolution SEM Imaging
- •Strategy 1
- •Strategy 2
- •14.5 Selecting the Beam Current
- •14.5.1 High Resolution Imaging
- •14.5.2 Low Contrast Features Require High Beam Current and/or Long Frame Time to Establish Visibility
- •14.6 Image Presentation
- •14.6.1 “Live” Display Adjustments
- •14.6.2 Post-Collection Processing
- •14.7 Image Interpretation
- •14.7.1 Observer’s Point of View
- •14.7.3 Contrast Encoding
- •14.8.1 VPSEM Advantages
- •14.8.2 VPSEM Disadvantages
- •15: SEM Case Studies
- •15.1 Case Study: How High Is That Feature Relative to Another?
- •15.2 Revealing Shallow Surface Relief
- •16.1.2 Minor Artifacts: The Si-Escape Peak
- •16.1.3 Minor Artifacts: Coincidence Peaks
- •16.1.4 Minor Artifacts: Si Absorption Edge and Si Internal Fluorescence Peak
- •16.2 “Best Practices” for Electron-Excited EDS Operation
- •16.2.1 Operation of the EDS System
- •Choosing the EDS Time Constant (Resolution and Throughput)
- •Choosing the Solid Angle of the EDS
- •Selecting a Beam Current for an Acceptable Level of System Dead-Time
- •16.3.1 Detector Geometry
- •16.3.2 Process Time
- •16.3.3 Optimal Working Distance
- •16.3.4 Detector Orientation
- •16.3.5 Count Rate Linearity
- •16.3.6 Energy Calibration Linearity
- •16.3.7 Other Items
- •16.3.8 Setting Up a Quality Control Program
- •Using the QC Tools Within DTSA-II
- •Creating a QC Project
- •Linearity of Output Count Rate with Live-Time Dose
- •Resolution and Peak Position Stability with Count Rate
- •Solid Angle for Low X-ray Flux
- •Maximizing Throughput at Moderate Resolution
- •References
- •17: DTSA-II EDS Software
- •17.1 Getting Started With NIST DTSA-II
- •17.1.1 Motivation
- •17.1.2 Platform
- •17.1.3 Overview
- •17.1.4 Design
- •Simulation
- •Quantification
- •Experiment Design
- •Modeled Detectors (. Fig. 17.1)
- •Window Type (. Fig. 17.2)
- •The Optimal Working Distance (. Figs. 17.3 and 17.4)
- •Elevation Angle
- •Sample-to-Detector Distance
- •Detector Area
- •Crystal Thickness
- •Number of Channels, Energy Scale, and Zero Offset
- •Resolution at Mn Kα (Approximate)
- •Azimuthal Angle
- •Gold Layer, Aluminum Layer, Nickel Layer
- •Dead Layer
- •Zero Strobe Discriminator (. Figs. 17.7 and 17.8)
- •Material Editor Dialog (. Figs. 17.9, 17.10, 17.11, 17.12, 17.13, and 17.14)
- •17.2.1 Introduction
- •17.2.2 Monte Carlo Simulation
- •17.2.4 Optional Tables
- •References
- •18: Qualitative Elemental Analysis by Energy Dispersive X-Ray Spectrometry
- •18.1 Quality Assurance Issues for Qualitative Analysis: EDS Calibration
- •18.2 Principles of Qualitative EDS Analysis
- •Exciting Characteristic X-Rays
- •Fluorescence Yield
- •X-ray Absorption
- •Si Escape Peak
- •Coincidence Peaks
- •18.3 Performing Manual Qualitative Analysis
- •Beam Energy
- •Choosing the EDS Resolution (Detector Time Constant)
- •Obtaining Adequate Counts
- •18.4.1 Employ the Available Software Tools
- •18.4.3 Lower Photon Energy Region
- •18.4.5 Checking Your Work
- •18.5 A Worked Example of Manual Peak Identification
- •References
- •19.1 What Is a k-ratio?
- •19.3 Sets of k-ratios
- •19.5 The Analytical Total
- •19.6 Normalization
- •19.7.1 Oxygen by Assumed Stoichiometry
- •19.7.3 Element by Difference
- •19.8 Ways of Reporting Composition
- •19.8.1 Mass Fraction
- •19.8.2 Atomic Fraction
- •19.8.3 Stoichiometry
- •19.8.4 Oxide Fractions
- •Example Calculations
- •19.9 The Accuracy of Quantitative Electron-Excited X-ray Microanalysis
- •19.9.1 Standards-Based k-ratio Protocol
- •19.9.2 “Standardless Analysis”
- •19.10 Appendix
- •19.10.1 The Need for Matrix Corrections To Achieve Quantitative Analysis
- •19.10.2 The Physical Origin of Matrix Effects
- •19.10.3 ZAF Factors in Microanalysis
- •X-ray Generation With Depth, φ(ρz)
- •X-ray Absorption Effect, A
- •X-ray Fluorescence, F
- •References
- •20.2 Instrumentation Requirements
- •20.2.1 Choosing the EDS Parameters
- •EDS Spectrum Channel Energy Width and Spectrum Energy Span
- •EDS Time Constant (Resolution and Throughput)
- •EDS Calibration
- •EDS Solid Angle
- •20.2.2 Choosing the Beam Energy, E0
- •20.2.3 Measuring the Beam Current
- •20.2.4 Choosing the Beam Current
- •Optimizing Analysis Strategy
- •20.3.4 Ba-Ti Interference in BaTiSi3O9
- •20.4 The Need for an Iterative Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis Strategy
- •20.4.2 Analysis of a Stainless Steel
- •20.5 Is the Specimen Homogeneous?
- •20.6 Beam-Sensitive Specimens
- •20.6.1 Alkali Element Migration
- •20.6.2 Materials Subject to Mass Loss During Electron Bombardment—the Marshall-Hall Method
- •Thin Section Analysis
- •Bulk Biological and Organic Specimens
- •References
- •21: Trace Analysis by SEM/EDS
- •21.1 Limits of Detection for SEM/EDS Microanalysis
- •21.2.1 Estimating CDL from a Trace or Minor Constituent from Measuring a Known Standard
- •21.2.2 Estimating CDL After Determination of a Minor or Trace Constituent with Severe Peak Interference from a Major Constituent
- •21.3 Measurements of Trace Constituents by Electron-Excited Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectrometry
- •The Inevitable Physics of Remote Excitation Within the Specimen: Secondary Fluorescence Beyond the Electron Interaction Volume
- •Simulation of Long-Range Secondary X-ray Fluorescence
- •NIST DTSA II Simulation: Vertical Interface Between Two Regions of Different Composition in a Flat Bulk Target
- •NIST DTSA II Simulation: Cubic Particle Embedded in a Bulk Matrix
- •21.5 Summary
- •References
- •22.1.2 Low Beam Energy Analysis Range
- •22.2 Advantage of Low Beam Energy X-Ray Microanalysis
- •22.2.1 Improved Spatial Resolution
- •22.3 Challenges and Limitations of Low Beam Energy X-Ray Microanalysis
- •22.3.1 Reduced Access to Elements
- •22.3.3 At Low Beam Energy, Almost Everything Is Found To Be Layered
- •Analysis of Surface Contamination
- •References
- •23: Analysis of Specimens with Special Geometry: Irregular Bulk Objects and Particles
- •23.2.1 No Chemical Etching
- •23.3 Consequences of Attempting Analysis of Bulk Materials With Rough Surfaces
- •23.4.1 The Raw Analytical Total
- •23.4.2 The Shape of the EDS Spectrum
- •23.5 Best Practices for Analysis of Rough Bulk Samples
- •23.6 Particle Analysis
- •Particle Sample Preparation: Bulk Substrate
- •The Importance of Beam Placement
- •Overscanning
- •“Particle Mass Effect”
- •“Particle Absorption Effect”
- •The Analytical Total Reveals the Impact of Particle Effects
- •Does Overscanning Help?
- •23.6.6 Peak-to-Background (P/B) Method
- •Specimen Geometry Severely Affects the k-ratio, but Not the P/B
- •Using the P/B Correspondence
- •23.7 Summary
- •References
- •24: Compositional Mapping
- •24.2 X-Ray Spectrum Imaging
- •24.2.1 Utilizing XSI Datacubes
- •24.2.2 Derived Spectra
- •SUM Spectrum
- •MAXIMUM PIXEL Spectrum
- •24.3 Quantitative Compositional Mapping
- •24.4 Strategy for XSI Elemental Mapping Data Collection
- •24.4.1 Choosing the EDS Dead-Time
- •24.4.2 Choosing the Pixel Density
- •24.4.3 Choosing the Pixel Dwell Time
- •“Flash Mapping”
- •High Count Mapping
- •References
- •25.1 Gas Scattering Effects in the VPSEM
- •25.1.1 Why Doesn’t the EDS Collimator Exclude the Remote Skirt X-Rays?
- •25.2 What Can Be Done To Minimize gas Scattering in VPSEM?
- •25.2.2 Favorable Sample Characteristics
- •Particle Analysis
- •25.2.3 Unfavorable Sample Characteristics
- •References
- •26.1 Instrumentation
- •26.1.2 EDS Detector
- •26.1.3 Probe Current Measurement Device
- •Direct Measurement: Using a Faraday Cup and Picoammeter
- •A Faraday Cup
- •Electrically Isolated Stage
- •Indirect Measurement: Using a Calibration Spectrum
- •26.1.4 Conductive Coating
- •26.2 Sample Preparation
- •26.2.1 Standard Materials
- •26.2.2 Peak Reference Materials
- •26.3 Initial Set-Up
- •26.3.1 Calibrating the EDS Detector
- •Selecting a Pulse Process Time Constant
- •Energy Calibration
- •Quality Control
- •Sample Orientation
- •Detector Position
- •Probe Current
- •26.4 Collecting Data
- •26.4.1 Exploratory Spectrum
- •26.4.2 Experiment Optimization
- •26.4.3 Selecting Standards
- •26.4.4 Reference Spectra
- •26.4.5 Collecting Standards
- •26.4.6 Collecting Peak-Fitting References
- •26.5 Data Analysis
- •26.5.2 Quantification
- •26.6 Quality Check
- •Reference
- •27.2 Case Study: Aluminum Wire Failures in Residential Wiring
- •References
- •28: Cathodoluminescence
- •28.1 Origin
- •28.2 Measuring Cathodoluminescence
- •28.3 Applications of CL
- •28.3.1 Geology
- •Carbonado Diamond
- •Ancient Impact Zircons
- •28.3.2 Materials Science
- •Semiconductors
- •Lead-Acid Battery Plate Reactions
- •28.3.3 Organic Compounds
- •References
- •29.1.1 Single Crystals
- •29.1.2 Polycrystalline Materials
- •29.1.3 Conditions for Detecting Electron Channeling Contrast
- •Specimen Preparation
- •Instrument Conditions
- •29.2.1 Origin of EBSD Patterns
- •29.2.2 Cameras for EBSD Pattern Detection
- •29.2.3 EBSD Spatial Resolution
- •29.2.5 Steps in Typical EBSD Measurements
- •Sample Preparation for EBSD
- •Align Sample in the SEM
- •Check for EBSD Patterns
- •Adjust SEM and Select EBSD Map Parameters
- •Run the Automated Map
- •29.2.6 Display of the Acquired Data
- •29.2.7 Other Map Components
- •29.2.10 Application Example
- •Application of EBSD To Understand Meteorite Formation
- •29.2.11 Summary
- •Specimen Considerations
- •EBSD Detector
- •Selection of Candidate Crystallographic Phases
- •Microscope Operating Conditions and Pattern Optimization
- •Selection of EBSD Acquisition Parameters
- •Collect the Orientation Map
- •References
- •30.1 Introduction
- •30.2 Ion–Solid Interactions
- •30.3 Focused Ion Beam Systems
- •30.5 Preparation of Samples for SEM
- •30.5.1 Cross-Section Preparation
- •30.5.2 FIB Sample Preparation for 3D Techniques and Imaging
- •30.6 Summary
- •References
- •31: Ion Beam Microscopy
- •31.1 What Is So Useful About Ions?
- •31.2 Generating Ion Beams
- •31.3 Signal Generation in the HIM
- •31.5 Patterning with Ion Beams
- •31.7 Chemical Microanalysis with Ion Beams
- •References
- •Appendix
- •A Database of Electron–Solid Interactions
- •A Database of Electron–Solid Interactions
- •Introduction
- •Backscattered Electrons
- •Secondary Yields
- •Stopping Powers
- •X-ray Ionization Cross Sections
- •Conclusions
- •References
- •Index
- •Reference List
- •Index
16.1 · The Energy Dispersive Spectrometry (EDS) Process
. Fig. 16.4 EDS “black box” representation of the Si-escape peak artifact
Input:
X-ray photon
Number of photons
213 |
|
16 |
|
|
|
Artifacts: escape peak
Si K-L3 = 1.74 keV
EDS black box
Output:
The EDS estimate of photon energy is robbed by the amount of the
Si K-L3 photon energy (1.74 keV) that is lost.
|
|
Should have been |
1.74 keV |
|
placed here! |
|
||
|
|
|
Actually placed here!
Photon energy
subject to the EDS resolution function, including the X-ray bremsstrahlung (continuum) background, but because the continuum is created at all energies up to E0 and because of its slow variation with photon energy, the distortions introduced into the continuum background by the EDS resolution function are more difficult to discern.
The major impact of peak broadening is the frequent occurrence in practical analytical situations of mutually interfering peaks that arise even with pure elements, for example, Si K-L3 and Si K-M3 and the Fe L-family. When mixtures of elements are analyzed, Interferences are especially frequent when elements with atomic numbers above 20 are present since these elements have increasingly complex spectra of L- and M- shell X-rays that have a wide energy span. A secondary impact of peak broadening occurs when trace elements are to be measured. Peak broadening has the effect of spreading the characteristic X-rays over a wide range of the X-ray continuum background. Variance in the background sets the ultimate limit of detection.
another photoelectron and further contributing to the charge generation. However, in a small number of events, as illustrated schematically in . Fig. 16.4, the Si K-shell X-ray will escape from the detector, carrying with it 1.740 keV (for a Si K-L3 X-ray) and robbing the original photon being captured of this amount of energy, which creates an artifact peak at an energy corresponding to:
Escape peak energy = Parent peak energy −1.740 keV \ (16.3)
Si-escape peaks are illustrated for tin and gold in . Fig. 16.5. The intensity ratio of the Si-escape peak/parent peak depends on the energy of the parent photon, with a maximum value for this ratio occurring for photon energies just above the Si K-shell ionization energy (1.838 keV) and decreasing as the photon energy increases. It is important to identify Si-escape peaks so that they are not mistaken for elements present at minor or trace levels.
16.1.2\ Minor Artifacts: The Si-Escape Peak
After photoelectric absorption by a silicon atom in the detector, the atom is left in an ionized excited state with a vacancy in the K- or L- shell. This excited state will decay by inter- shell electron transitions that result in the emission of a Si Auger electron (e.g., KLL), which will undergo inelastic scattering and contribute to the free charge generation, or in about 10 % of the events, a Si K-shell X-ray. This Si K-shell X-ray will propagate in the detector and in most cases will be undergo photoelectric absorption with the L-shell, ejecting
16.1.3\ Minor Artifacts: Coincidence Peaks
Although the EDS spectrum appears to an observer to accumulate simultaneously at all energies, the EDS system is in fact only capable of processing one photon at a time, with a duty cycle that ranges from 200 ns to several microseconds, depending on the particular EDS. If a second photon should enter the detector during this measurement period, the photon energies would be added together, producing an artifact known as a “coincidence peak” or a “sum peak,” as illustrated schematically in . Fig. 16.6. An “anti-coincidence function” or “fast discriminator” is incorporated in the signal processing
\214 Chapter 16 · Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectrometry: Physical Principles and User-Selected Parameters
|
12 000 |
|
|
|
|
|
SnL |
|
|
|
Sn |
|
|
Sn_20kV10nA50s |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
-L3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M- |
|
Sn |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 000 |
|
|
|
|
|
4,5 |
|
|
M4+5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
E0 = 20 keV |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
escape |
SnL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
8 000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sn |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Counts |
|
|
|
|
|
M- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
L2+3-K C |
|
|
|
|
esc Sn |
4 |
|
|
|
L2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
escape |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|||
6 000 |
N3-N2+5-M4 Sn |
|
|
|
|
|
|
M4 |
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
4 000 |
|
Sn |
|
|
|
Sn |
N5-L3 Sn |
|
N2+3-L1 Sn |
|
||||||
|
M3 |
|
|
|
Sn |
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
Sn |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
Sn |
- |
|
M1-L3Sn |
|
L1- |
N4-L2Sn |
|
||||||||
|
|
Sn |
|
M1-L2Sn |
|
|||||||||||
|
N5 |
|
|
|||||||||||||
2 000 |
M2 |
|
|
-L1 |
|
|||||||||||
- M3 |
N4-M2 |
|
M3 |
|
||||||||||||
|
- |
|
|
M2 |
|
|||||||||||
|
N1 |
|
|
|||||||||||||
0 |
N1 |
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
0.5 |
|
1.0 |
1.5 |
2.0 |
2.5 |
3.0 |
3.5 |
|
4.0 |
|
4.5 |
5.0 |
Photon energy (keV)
|
16 000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Au |
|
|
|
|
Au_20kV10nA50s |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Au |
|
|
|
|
|
14 000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
M5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
E0 = 20 keV |
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N6+7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 000 |
Au |
eAuM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AuMe |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
10 000 |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
N |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Counts |
|
N6-N6+5N4- |
6, |
4 |
|
|
|
N6-M4Au |
N5-N4+3-N1+3-M2Au |
|
|
|
|
|
8 000 |
N- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
6 000 |
escap escap |
|
N3-N2+5-M4Au |
|
5Au |
|
|
|
|
|||||
4 000 |
|
N1-M3 Au |
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
Au |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
-M3 |
|
|
|
|
||||||||
2 000 |
|
-M2 |
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
O4+ |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
N4 |
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
0.5 |
1.0 |
1.5 |
2.0 |
|
2.5 |
3.0 |
3.5 |
4.0 |
4.5 |
5.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Photon energy (keV) |
|
|
|
|
. Fig. 16.5 Si-escape peaks observed with an SDD-EDS for Sn and Au (E0 = 20 keV)
16 |
. Fig. 16.6 EDS “black box” rep- |
|
|
|
resentation of photon coincidence |
|
|
Number of photons
Input:
X-ray photons
Photon #1
Photon #2
Artifacts: coincidence losses and coincidence peaks
EDS black box
Output:
an estimate of photon energy
A coincidence rejection function operates to reject incorrect measurements that result from
t
two different photons entering the EDS detector at nearly the same time and registering as one bad count.
Coincidence count
Photon energy
215 |
16 |
16.1 · The Energy Dispersive Spectrometry (EDS) Process
Counts
Counts
Al_20keV14%DT
1,000,000
|
|
Al |
|
|
|
|
800,000 |
|
E0 = 20 keV |
|
|
|
|
|
Deadtime = 14% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
600,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
400,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
8 |
10 |
|
0 |
2 |
4 |
6 |
|||
|
|
Photon energy (keV) |
|
|
|
|
18,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Al+Al coincidence |
|
Al_20keV14%DT |
|
16,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
4 |
5 |
|
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
Photon energy (keV)
. Fig. 16.7 Al at E0 = 20 keV. Coincidence peak (Al + Al) observed at dead-time = 14 %. Note proximity of this artifact peak to Ar K-L2,3 and Ag L-M family
chain to suppress this effect by rejecting the measurement of both photons, but as the flux of X-rays increases, an increasing frequency of events will occur in which the time separation between the two events is too short for the anti-coincidence function to recognize and reject the separate photons, resulting in an artifact sum photon. This coincidence phenomenon can occur between any two photons, for example, two characteristic X-rays, a characteristic X-ray plus a continuum X-ray, or two continuum X-rays. Coincidence produces a readily recognizable artifact peak when coincidence occurs between two photon energies that are particularly abundant, which is the case for high intensity characteristic X-ray peaks. An example is shown in . Fig. 16.7, where two Al K-L3 photons
(1.487 keV) combine to produce a coincidence peak at 2.972 keV. Coincidence events can be formed from any two characteristic peaks, for example, O K-L+Si K-L2. It is important to identify coincidence peaks so that they are not mistaken for characteristic peaks of elements present at minor or trace levels. Coincidence events involving lower energy photons will occur above the Duane–Hunt high energy limit
(which corresponds to the incident beam energy, E0) and should not be mistaken for the true limit.
16.1.4\ Minor Artifacts: Si Absorption Edge and Si Internal Fluorescence Peak
X-rays entering the EDS must pass through a window, typically a thin polymer, which is often supported on an etched silicon grid. Some X-rays will be absorbed in this grid silicon, especially those whose photon energy is just above the Si K-ionization energy (1.839 keV). In addition, there is a thin inactive Si layer (“dead-layer”) just below the entrance electrode of the EDS that also acts to absorb X-rays. The X-ray mass absorption coefficient of silicon increases abruptly at the
K-shell ionization energy, and this has the effect of increasing the absorption of the X-ray continuum, producing an abrupt step. However, the EDS resolution function acts to broaden all photon energies so that this sharp feature is also broadened, as seen in . Fig. 16.8 (after peak fitting for Si) and made into a